DDMARC vs EasyDMARCEasyDMARC is a good product. Here is when it is the better one.
Comparison pages where the vendor wins every row are worth nothing to you. Two things separate these products — domains per tier and ARC monitoring — and on interface simplicity EasyDMARC beats us outright. Everything below is checked against both published price lists.
Free plan: 2 domains, no card, no expiry · Trial: card required, billed on day 15 unless you cancel · 14-day money-back on new paid plans
The difference is domain count, not the sticker price.
Both publish monthly prices. What the headline number hides is how many domains each tier admits before you are pushed up one.
Above four domains EasyDMARC’s published ladder ends and you are into an Enterprise quote. Ours keeps going on the pricing page: Growth to fifteen, Professional to twenty-five, then Partner and Enterprise.
List prices, monthly, at the stated domain count. Plans are not like for like: see the matrix for what each includes.
Four things, not thirty-seven rows.
Both products monitor DMARC, parse aggregate reports, generate records and score your posture. Listing those as wins would be padding. These are the differences that decide it.
How many domains a tier admits
This is where the money is. Their Plus tier covers two domains; our Protect covers five for less. If you have three domains, that single fact decides the comparison.
ARC chain monitoring
ARC is how you tell a forwarded message apart from a spoof. Without it, forwarding failures and real attacks look similar in your reports — which is exactly when teams stall before enforcement.
Policy impact simulator
Model what moving to p=reject would have done to last month’s real traffic, before you change the record. It is the difference between an enforcement date and an enforcement hope.
Managed MTA-STS and BIMI hosting
Both gate MTA-STS hosting to a mid tier, and the two tiers are within $3 of each other; ours also brings ARC monitoring and covers fifteen domains. Their Managed BIMI is cheaper: it starts on Plus at $35.99.
Where EasyDMARC is the better buy.
If none of these is you, switching costs an afternoon and no data: DMARC reports are generated by receiving providers, so migrating is a change to one DNS record. Ask and we will do the bulk of it at no charge, including running both platforms in parallel while you decide — the offer and the details are below.
Leaving EasyDMARC for a reason not listed here? The EasyDMARC alternatives roundup covers the reasons and names the cheaper fix →
Feature by feature.
| Capability | DDMARC | EasyDMARC |
|---|---|---|
| Core monitoring | ||
| DMARC monitoring | Yes | Yes |
| SPF and DKIM monitoring | Yes | Yes |
| Aggregate reports (RUA) | Yes | Yes |
| Forensic reports (RUF) | Protect+ | Paid |
| ARC chain monitoring | Growth+ | Not documented |
| Policy impact simulator | Protect+ | Not documented |
| DNS and hosting | ||
| DNS record monitoring | Yes | Yes |
| MTA-STS monitoring | Protect+ | Paid |
| BIMI monitoring | Protect+ | Paid |
| Managed MTA-STS hosting | Growth+ | Premium |
| Managed BIMI logo hosting | Growth+ | Plus |
| Domains included at that tier | 15 | 4 |
| DMARC and SPF record generators | Yes | Yes |
| Detection and compliance | ||
| Security score | Yes | Yes |
| TLS-RPT reporting | Protect+ | Not documented |
| Lookalike domain detection | Professional+ | Not documented |
| AI posture explainer | Professional+ | Not documented |
| Bulk-sender compliance checks | Professional+ | Not documented |
| Policy rollout automation | Professional+ | Not documented |
| Alerts, team and API | ||
| Email alerts | Yes | Yes |
| Slack | Protect+ | Paid |
| Microsoft Teams | Growth+ | Paid |
| Discord | Protect+ | Not documented |
| Telegram | Growth+ | Not documented |
| Custom webhooks | Protect+ | Paid |
| Multi-user access | Growth+ | Yes |
| Activity audit log | Every plan, 90 days | Paid |
| REST API access | Protect, $29/mo | Enterprise |
| Email volume cap | None on any tier | 100K emails/mo on Plus |
| SAML single sign-on | Enterprise | Enterprise |
“Not documented” means we could not find it stated in EasyDMARC’s public materials, not that it is absent. Competitor facts verified from public sources, including EasyDMARC’s pricing page, in October 2026— if something here is out of date, tell us and we will correct it.
The questions that decide it.
For MTA-STS they are close: our Growth plan is $69/mo and EasyDMARC’s Premium is $71.99/mo billed annually. Growth covers fifteen domains and adds ARC chain monitoring, where Premium covers four and ARC is not documented in EasyDMARC’s published plans at any tier. For BIMI alone EasyDMARC is cheaper, because Managed BIMI starts on their Plus tier at $35.99/mo. Checked October 2026.
Not as far as we can find in their public materials. ARC matters when your mail is forwarded or passes through mailing lists: it is the mechanism that lets a receiver see the original authentication result. Without ARC visibility, a broken forwarder and a genuine spoofing attempt can look alike in your reports, which is what makes people hesitate at the enforcement step.
Their pricing page lists a free trial with no card required, and no free plan; the first paid tier, Plus, covers two domains. Our free Monitor plan covers 2 domains with 30 days of history and no expiry date. Checked October 2026.
Yes, on Enterprise agreements: SAML 2.0 and OIDC single sign-on is provisioned as part of the contract, not switched on from the dashboard. Self-serve plans sign in with an emailed link or code, a passkey, Google or a Microsoft work or school account; there are no passwords. If SSO is a requirement, raise it before purchasing so it is written into the agreement from day one.
Low effort, because none of your data lives in the platform. DMARC reports are generated by receiving providers, so switching means changing the rua= address in one DNS record. You can also point reports at both platforms simultaneously and compare for two weeks before committing — DMARC explicitly allows multiple report addresses. Ask and we will do the bulk of the work at no charge.
You should not trust it on its own — that is why every claim here is either a published price you can check on their site, or marked “not documented” where we could not verify it. Run both products against the same domain for two weeks; the data will tell you more than we can. And if a fact here is wrong or stale, email us and we will change it.
Run both for two weeks.
Point the same domain’s reports at both platforms — DMARC lets you send to more than one address. Two weeks of side-by-side data settles this better than any comparison table, including this one.
Competitor names are trademarks of their owners, used only to identify the products compared. Not affiliated or endorsed. Corrections: hello@ddmarc.com.